Change Leaders
Communicating with Internal and External Stakeholders
Key Issues |
Traditional
Management View |
Emerging Change
Leader view |
Basic Mindset |
Analyze, leverage,
optimize, delegate, organize, and control itI know best |
Do it, fix it, try
it, change itand do it all over again; no
one person knows best |
End-game |
Always make the
numbers right |
Satisfy beneficiaries
& workers Assumptions |
Leadership |
A few good men will
get it done |
I must get the best
out of all my |
Philosophy |
for me |
my people |
Sources of
Productivity and Innovation |
People=exploitable
resource |
People=critical
resource |
Accountability |
I hold you
accountable |
We hold ourselves
accountable |
Risk/reward Trade-offs |
I cannot afford to
fail or leave |
I can work
hereor elsewhere |
Source: excerpted from Katzenbach, et. al.
The goal of the several
year study by McKinsey consultants was to understand who leads successful change in
organizations and how that change was accomplished. They
found, in part, that change that came from the top levels of organizations was often
thwarted at lower organizational levels. It
was particular managers placed in the mid-level of organizations that were able to
creatively and successfully navigate intense organizational change.
The McKinsey team found
that traditional managers saw themselves as the primary agent of decision-making and
control. They felt that they knew best, so
they relied almost solely on their own knowledge and influence to manage. Traditional managers were more likely to focus on
quantitative ends (i.e. making numbers right), to view people as exploitable and to
externalize blame (I hold you accountable) if things did not go right in their
organizational units. Furthermore, traditional
managers operated from fear: they did not
believe that there was room for error and they did not see changing jobs as a viable
career option.
In contrast, what
McKinsey calls Real Change Leaders (RCLs) tended to share their power. RCLs were willing to try new approaches to problem
solving that allowed for risk taking and mistakes. Importantly,
RCLs saw the value of distributing power among working teams comprised of people the RCL
viewed as already knowledgeable and capable of decision making. Instead of focusing solely on the numbers, RCLs
were interested in satisfying beneficiaries and workers, held everyone on the team accountable
for outcomes and were not afraid to move to a new working environment.
One of the most
encouraging aspects of the McKinsey study was that the leaders they interviewed were
successful at creating change at organizations such as Compaq or Enron. In addition, these leaders took the risks necessary
to implement change and cared for people along the way.
Managers are
organizationally designated authorities, but being appointed as a leader does not mean
that we intuitively know how to lead or that anyone helps us learn how to lead others. Furthermore, leadership can be exercised by anyone
in an organization, regardless of her/his formal position;
however, as a manger, you are in a uniquely qualified position to effect
change by the leadership you exercise in relation to your peers, subordinates and
superiors. In what follows, we offer some
tools for transforming your leadership role for your changing organizational environment.
Note: Katzenbach, et. al. Conducted in-depth interviews
with over 150 down-the-line change leaders over a three-year period. The common characteristic amongst the leaders was
that they were all facing challenging change situations.
In teams
of 3-4, generate a 10-15-item list indicating how you can apply the principles of the
Emerging Change Leader View to your management position at your organization. What needs to happen in the organization to support
this innovative kind of leadership?