Playlist on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCAD5B4618AC52201
See the Manual Chapter
Communication and Global Cultures
The partecipatory approach
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Issue dealt with in
Episode 8 - MDG 8: Develop a Global
Partnership for Development
Cultural identities and intercultural dialogue: is
dialogue a risk or an opportunity for the preservation of community heritage?
See
also:
|
|
Testimonials
|
P. Krishna is the Rector of the
Krishnamurti Foundation India, Varanasi. He was interviewed in Delhi on
the 24th of March 2010 by
Fausto Aarya De Santis
-
How can Communities count more in Development Choices
-
Role of Aid and opinion on foreign aid
He thinks that old
distinctions between "international aid" and "local aid" are no
longer valid, because the world is now a global village and we feel
global ethical responsibilities. What is important is to understand
how to make aid effective and fair. In cases of emergencies the aid
given as external "assistance" surely provides immediate relief;
but it should not continue for long; aid should become development
cooperation, otherwise it will weaken the recipients and make them
chronically aid dependent. "If instead we can educate them to stand
on their own legs, we have really helped them." The real long term
empowerment is only through education.
"We now live in a global world, so we must
not distinguish anymore between foreign aid and local aid. What is
important is to understand how aid must be given. In cases of
emergency, aid surely provides immediate relief, but it should not
lead the receiver to be a parasite on society. If instead we can
educate them stand... on their own legs, we have really helped them.
Aid as Aspirin has value but as a cure for the disease has no value.
Long term help is in the form of Education. "
|
|
see full interview:
:http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL19CD1F8E78885101 |
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
Zulfiquar Haider
is the National Programme Coordinator for the
Planning Commission (GoI) - UN, Joint Programme on Convergence. He was
interviewed in Delhi on the 13th of April 2010 by
Fausto Aarya De Santis
In India right from the time of
Mahatma Gandhi the idea of a village republic, power to the people has
been there. Over a period of time in the practice of development both
in academia and practice, it has been apparent that once you have
planning done locally then people have a better idea of their needs,
aspiration and they will have ownership of ideas; and whatever
therefore gets done will be much more efficient and effective.
There is now a very strong commitment
from the Government to get local communities more involved in
development activities. There is space being given and if somebody can
properly demonstrate how it can happen, it will be honored. This is
what the program we are doing is trying to achieve. We want to
demonstrate how the bottom up planning will actually function. How
there can be convergent action around the people's own plans, how to
give information to the communities as to what is happening to their
plans and trying to identify the bottle necks of large government
schemes at district levels - there is a lot of unspent money at
district levels in India which is very sad.
Why should we be identified so much
with anything. One can have a fluid idea of identity. The danger is
when we are so strongly identified that implicitly we are saying that
our is the right way and the other is way is either lesser or wrong...
and this is one of the fundamental reason of conflict and violence in
the world.
Honestly i don't think it takes too
much intelligence to just observe life around to realize that what we
hold on to are nothing more than conditioning. If a person is
identified with a religion, it is just an accident of birth. Which
would easily reaviel that there is nothing fundamental about it. So
whatever perspective we carry are just conditioning based on
socialization and the upbringing we had, so there isn't necessary a
grand ultimate truth about it. Therefore there is no reason to hold on
to it and say this is the only way. You can be flexible and curious
about life.
How to address this? I think we need
to create spaces and platforms where dialogue can happen, where people
can get relaxed about their identity.... and as child that curiosity
which is innate needs to be foster.
|
|
see full interview:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL77195325F4994608
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
Rajendra K. Pachauri , Nobel Peace Prize winner, is the Director General
of the
The Energy and Resources Institute, TERI. He was interviewed in New
Delhi, India on the second week of February 2011 by
Stefano De Santis
-
How can the youth approach
studies and work for and inclusive development? Is joining the NGO the
only way? Development is not just government, is
not just civil society… it involves also the corporate sector. If a
young person who is socially conscious is getting an MBA program, then
in the course of studying for that MBA program then that person must
also understand how he can be responsible towards society in business
decision making. In each of our profession there is a great deal we can
do, we don’t necessarily have to join an NGO to do good to society, we
can do it in whatever profession we are in. Today companies are becoming much more
sensitive towards these issues.
|
|
see full interview:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1B4B968D8E371E8F |
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
Interviewed by the TVP Documentary team in India, Zulfiquar
Haider the National
Programme Coordinator for the Planning
Commission (GoI) - UN, Joint Programme on Convergence believes
on a fluid concept of identity, not a rigid one. A rigid form of
identity implicitly says that "our is the right way and the other
is way is either lesser or wrong" and this is "one of the
fundamental reason of conflict and violence in the world.". For
him "if a person is identified with a religion, it is just an
accident of birth", which shows that there is nothing fundamental
about his identity or truth claim.""Honestly" he says, "i don't
think it takes too much intelligence to just observe life around
to realize that what we hold on to are nothing more than
conditioning." There is no reason for holding on to identitly and
say this is the only way; "you can be flexible and curious about
life."
See more
in the complete
interview
|
3kLSxgR4ttc|200}} |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kLSxgR4ttc |
|
The concept of an
identity that is static is a huge mistake. Any effort to preserve identity is
backward looking, static and frozen. The global environment is increasing the
possibilities for countries and cultures to interact and i would strongly in
favor of anything which increases that interaction.
But i'm not a
supporter of the idea of all cultures merging into a some
pre-digested-homogenized-mush. I would like to see an interaction of cultures
where cultures absorb things from outside, contribute things to the outside
but yet remain disticntly different. How do you get the balance is the issue
in my view.
{{#ev:youtube|gbVIuRavUQ8|300}}
|
|
Testimonials
|
We asked Fabio
Poggi, the current Councillor
for International Cooperation in Modena (Italy),
how it is possible to sensitise people who are unlikely motivated
towards cooperation.
Modena is a
multi-ethnic city, and yet, unfortunately not everyone is naturally
keen to open to the Other. What is the strategy used by the
Municipality of Modena in order to influence and make favourably
disposed those who do not like the meeting with non-EU citizens? How
to target those people who want non-EU citizens to return home?
Read his opinion in<span /> his
interview
|
|
Link to the
full written interview: http://www.TVP.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Interview_to_Fabio_Poggi
Link to the audio interview on Youtube, (italian language) ⇒ Part
2 |
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
Why does the
EU work for a Glabal Partnership for Development?
Interviewed
by the TVP Documentary team in India, Daničle
Smadja, the EU Ambassador to India. She says that the EU was very
committed towards the MDGs when they were put together in the UN. In
achieving MDG 8, the EU believes that its development assistance
should always go hand-in-had and support the national strategies and
policies of the country with which is creates a partnership and gives
aid to. When a partnership is created we work with the projection of
the European values but it does not impose our own model to the
countries we work with. ⇒ View her
complete interview |
{{#ev:youtube&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#124; V2rEj4Og9VY &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#124;200}} |
|
|
Video Interview
- www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2rEj4Og9VY |
|
|
Testimonials
|
Daisaku Ikeda, Buddhist philosopher, educator and prolific writer
and poet, President of Soka
Gakkai International,
in his Peace
Proposal to United Nations (2009) deepens
a new concept of Development, what he defines the
Humanitarian competition, the key paradigm for the twenty-first
century to build a Global Partnership for Development
I am fully
convinced that the time has now arrived, a hundred years after it was
originally proposed, for us to turn our attention to humanitarian
competition as a guiding principle for the new era.One reason is that
social justice and equality, proposed by socialism as an antidote to
the ills of capitalism, are indeed rooted in humanistic principles.
These ideals should not be allowed to perish along with the systemic
failure of communism. For to do so would be to condemn to the oblivion
of forgetfulness one of the crucial experiences of the twentieth
century--how the socialist movement attracted the allegiance of so
many people,especially the young, across such large swathes of the
planet.The question remains then as to why, if socialism is informed
with valid principles, it has generally failed as a system. Here it is
valuable to reference Makiguchi's insight: "When free competition is
hampered, whether by natural or man-made influences, this results
instagnation, stasis and regression." The failure of socialism can be
attributed to the failure to adequately take into account the value of
competition as a source of energy andvitality. There was an all too
optimistic faith that if we could only eliminate social classes and
establish the right conditions, a genuinely humane society would
inevitably result.Free competition driven by the unrestrained impulses
of selfishness can descend into the kind of social Darwinism in which
the strong prey on the weak. But competition conducted within an
appropriate framework of rules and conventions brings forth the
energies of individuals and revitalizes society.Herein lies the value
of humanitarian competition. As a concept, it compels us to confront
the reality of competition while ensuring that it is conducted firmly
on the basis of humane values, thus bringing forth a synergistic
reaction between humanitarian concerns and competitive energies. It is
this that qualifies humanitarian competition to be a key paradigm for
the twenty-first century
|
|
Read the
article "Humanitarian Competition: a key paradigm for the twenty-first
century" http://www.TVP.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Humanitarian_Competition:_a_key_paradigm_for_the_twenty-first_century
Read Daisaku
Ikeda 's Peace Proposal to United Nations, 2009: "Toward Humanitarian
Competition: A New Current in History"http://www.daisakuikeda.org/assets/files/pp2009.pdf
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
Interviewed by the TVP Documentary team in India,Anurag
Behar says that if
there is a coherence then there will be sustained good effect and
if there is no coherence, then there will be sustained good
effect. If there is no coherence then there will only be
replication. I think at the core of this there are two issues and
they are inter-related: - The first issue, and it applies to all
the stakeholders: civil society, government, corporate, etc. is
that of an openness of mind about intentions, about trust. Too
long have we looked at each other as adversaries. We think that
the government is bad, the government does not do. Somebody in the
government might think that the civil society people are here only
to protest and the only thing they know is the activist form of
doing things and they cannot contribute. This atmosphere of
miss-trust is the first thing that has to be eliminated because
that is the heart of the second issue, which is - That if you have
mistrust you don’t have dialogue. If you have trust that which
builds continuous dialogue, I think that is the simplest, and I
would say it is the only mechanism, which makes sure that we are
not doing the same thing over and over again with very limited
success, but that we are doing things in a coordinated fashion, we
are doing things which are complimentary and supplementary, rather
than repeating the same things.
|
{{#ev:youtube&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#124;F6KiPUIenS4&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#124;200}} |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6KiPUIenS4
|
|
http://www.eugad.eu/wiki/index.php/Decentralised_Cooperation